Home / Articles
The Pros and Cons of Open vs. Closed Rhinoplasty: Which Is Best for You?
Home / Articles
The Pros and Cons of Open vs. Closed Rhinoplasty: Which Is Best for You?
Rhinoplasty, often referred to as a "nose job," is one of the most sought-after cosmetic surgeries worldwide. This procedure not only refines the aesthetic appearance of the nose but can also improve nasal function and breathing. With advancements in surgical technology and technique, patients can now choose between two primary approaches: open and closed rhinoplasty.
As the nose plays a central role in facial harmony, even subtle changes can significantly enhance overall appearance and confidence. Whether you're looking to straighten a crooked bridge, reduce nostril size, or reshape the nasal tip, rhinoplasty offers a tailored solution to suit your facial structure and personal goals.
South Korea has emerged as a global leader in rhinoplasty, renowned for its precision, artistry, and natural-looking outcomes. Among the top clinics in Seoul, Human PS Clinic in Gangnam stands out for its personalized, cutting-edge nose surgeries led by Dr. Kim Kook Hyun, a distinguished plastic surgeon and professor with over a decade of experience.
This article explores the pros and cons of open vs. closed rhinoplasty, offering insights to help you decide which method aligns best with your aesthetic desires and surgical needs.
Open rhinoplasty involves making a small incision on the columella—the tissue that separates the nostrils—allowing the surgeon to lift the nasal skin and fully expose the underlying structures. This technique provides an unobstructed view of the bone and cartilage, making it ideal for more complex surgical cases.
Patients who require significant reshaping, reconstruction, or revision from a previous rhinoplasty often benefit most from the open approach. Surgeons can accurately assess and manipulate the nasal anatomy with enhanced visibility, ensuring symmetrical and stable results.
At Human PS Clinic, Dr. Kim utilizes open rhinoplasty for challenging cases, especially when performing type-specific adjustments or autologous grafting using the patient’s own tissues. The technique is particularly advantageous in cases involving trauma, congenital deformities, or when greater precision is essential for long-term success.